The big battery move project has been completed.

The major construction and moving project of moving the 47 batteries from the warehouse to the garage is completed. A shelving unit was engineered and constructed to hold 4136 pounds of batteries and here is the completed result.

These are all for sale so I figure each reader could buy one and put it in a backpack and carry around to run their phone or something.
Also, it should be noted for those not paying attention, I’m not 25 anymore and I had to lift and move each of these 88 lb batteries 5 times to get them from the warehouse to the shelf. That is a minimum of dead lifting 20680 lbs during the course of this project. I had to carry them probably a total of 30 feet which I guess would make 620400 ft/lbs or something.That makes you want to sing a song about carrying heavy weights.

This version is Merle Travis that wrote and recorded the song in 1946 and if that had been the only recording no one would have a loading song to sing because it wasn’t a big hit.
In the mid 50’s there was a guy from Tennessee that had a TV show that my mom and dad watched every week. Dad in particular liked the show. I’m sure that we were watching a couple weeks before my 7th birthday when Tennessee Ernie Ford sang on TV for the first time his hit song 16 Tons, pencil thin mustache and all.

This song went on to be covered by many groups and singers and there is probably not a person over 40 that can’t sing along with at least part of it. In fact here is the most recent cover by Jeff Beck and ZZ Top with Tal Wilkenfeld on bass.

HOWL HOWL HOWL HOWL

One soap box and the decline of the great American Experment

I traveled to the grocery store the other day to do the weekly grocery shopping. That is usually more than enough reason to actually go to the grocery store but this week I also needed laundry soap. So after getting the food items I made it to the laundry cleaning stuff isle. We use the same soap and as far as I know it is because it is the biggest box that they sell at the big Meijer. Mary may have other reasons. So I picked up the big orange box and was quite happy that laundry needs were satisfied for another 3 or 4 months. As I was moving the soap to the laundry room I noticed that it blared out in big letters “45% MORE”. Normally I don’t pay much attention to the writing on laundry boxes but I do tend to read all words put in front of me and I must say I was quite impressed at 45% more but didn’t study the whole situation nor had it influenced my decision to purchase.
We had a little left in the old box so I took it out to empty into the new box and low and behold I noticed something that made me realize why Marketing people have made America what it is today. (well for the moment forgetting Wall Street robber barons and Reaganomics) Here is the view that brought forth this epiphany.

The box on the left is the new box and the box on the right is the old box.  I noticed right away that there was a little difference. And then I made note that they both are 9.92 Lbs. So I’m sure that the average American that believes anything written as true would think that the new box is better than the old box unless that fact that it is not a “New Formula” would have any bearing on what they perceive as value. So I checked the ingredient make up and it all appears to be the same. It’s when you look at the top of the box that it becomes much clearer.

The explanation is in the details. They claim 150 loads so 45% is that much more that 102 loads and 25% is more than 120 loads. So I suppose they could also compare to the Laundromat package for 1 load and claim 15000% more. This now brings us to the new formula statement. It would seem that by new formula that they are not referring to what most people would consider to be a change in chemical composition but is in fact a new calculation of how many more theoretical loads can be produced with this box as opposed to some other box size. Marketing brilliance. Say something true but meaningless  and then make it appear as if it is something much greater. Think the war in Iraq and the deficit high business taxes and so on.

Oh and by the way there is one other deceptively brilliant marketing move that involves the new formula.  They claim 150 loads. I do 1 load per week when Mary is not home and we do maybe 4 when she is home so let’s say that is an average of 2 per week . This stuff should last a year and a half or lets just say a year to round off the numbers. As noted we get about 3 or 4 months. How can this be, you say. Are they lying? Can’t they be sued for that? On the side of the box it gives instructions for regular loads washers and dirtiness fill their handy (but huge) scoop to line 1 or 2. For huge washers and, I don’t know booms used to soak up the BP oil spill fill to line 3.

Here you have the scoop filled to line 2. This is about 1 oz. which would be 158 per box.

Here you have line 3 which is about 4oz which would be about 40 per box. (and would be in the ball park of our actual usage)

Since the vast majority of Americans don’t read instructions for everyday things the design of the scoop is marketing genius. It is a clear polystyrene with bumps for lines and as you can see lines 1 and 2 are way down at the bottom and not noticed unless you are looking for them. Line 3 is in the middle and the only line you see when you pick it up so of course that must be how much you use. As a result these guys probably sell 3 to 4 times as much of this stuff as they should because of the scoop psychology. If they designed a 1 oz scoop with instructions to match of 1 for normal loads 3 for oil spill materials most people would use the correct amount and their sales would drop 60%-75%.
So there you have it. In one soap box the root of everything that ails the great American Experiment.  All perpetrated by some marketing guy, probably this one.

Let’s take a break from wildlife adventures and discuss opera.

Out of all the main forms of music there are opera for me has to rank in the bottom 10%. I don’t like the sound of it and on the rare occasion that I have seen it on TV I don’t like the acting that goes with it. That’s my personal taste. Now Mary can enjoy the yellin’ fat lady and on occasion wishes to see the opera thing in Bejing.For me any thing Dick Cheney could think up couldn’t be as psychologically damaging as going to an opera performance. I just don’t have the level of culture necessary, I guess.
So with that in mind I need help understanding the clip I stumbled across that is part of an opera. I have no idea where this is being performed (because they are singing in opera language) but it is part of an opera from the early 1700’s written by some French dude.(I had to look that up, I didn’t just know it). It was written after some Indian chiefs from Illinois went to France and met the king and is this French guys concept if Indians or something. You can read about it here.
Now this is where my problem comes in. I understand all of the above and can appreciate the fact that people enjoy that kind of stuff. The link below in a professional presentation that I assume people got dressed up and paid money for but I just don’t get it. This is more like if Salvador Dali was somehow able to get inside my head when watching opera and took those brain images and then choreographed this thing. All I can say is people doing the chicken dance in front of the ass end of a giant gold turkey singing opera with corn cob pipes. How much more surrealistic can you get.
IS EVERYONE READY FOR SOME OPERA?